• Menu
  • Skip to right header navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary navigation
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Cabada Hameed LLP

Employment and Business Litigation Lawyers based in Southern California

  • Attorneys
    • Francisco Cabada
    • Sayema Hameed
  • Practice Areas
    • Employment Law
    • Business Litigation
  • News & Information
  • Contact Us
  • Search
  • Attorneys
    • Francisco Cabada
    • Sayema Hameed
  • Practice Areas
    • Employment Law
    • Business Litigation
  • News & Information
  • Contact Us
  • Search

Does Your Business Pay Commissions To Employees In California? Get Ready To Put It In Writing!

June 6, 2012 //  by Sayema Hameed//  Leave a Comment

by Sayema Hameed

Employers who pay commissions to employees in California must comply with the new California law, AB 1396.  Recently signed into law by Governor Jerry Brown, AB 1396 amends California Labor Code Section 2751 to require all employers who pay commissions to employees to enter into written commission contracts with those employees.  Employers must comply with this law by January 1, 2013.

The written commission contract must explain the method by which commissions are computed and paid.    In addition, employers must also give a copy of the signed contract to each employee and obtain a signed receipt for the contract from each employee.

In the event that a commission contract expires but the parties continue to work under the terms of the expired contract, the new law states that “the contract terms are presumed to remain in full force and effect until the contract is superseded or employment is terminated by either party.”  This means that the terms of an expired commission contract will continue to apply (and employers will have to pay commissions as described in the expired contract) until the parties sign a new contract or the employment is terminated.

Under the new law, “commissions” has the same meaning set forth in Labor Code Section 204.1, which states: “Commission wages are compensation paid to any person for services rendered in the sale of such employer’s property or services and based proportionately upon the amount or value thereof.”

Notably, the new law explicitly states that “commissions” does not include “short-term productivity bonuses such as are paid to retail clerks,” nor does it include “bonus and profit-sharing plans,” unless the employer offers to pay a fixed percentage of sales or profits as compensation.

Employers should start preparing for the new legal requirements in AB 1396 now.  Employers should prepare written contracts for all their commissioned employees that complies with the new law.  Remember that the contracts should detail how commissions are earned, calculated and paid, and employees must receive copy of the signed contract and provide a receipt.

Employers should also be prepared to deal with employees whose existing commission contracts expire on or after January 1, 2013.  Employers would be wise to prepare new agreements for those employees with expiring commission agreements; otherwise, the terms of the expired contracts will continue to apply.

Category: NewsTag: commissions

Previous Post: « Iskanian v. CLS Transportation Los Angeles, LLC: California Court Applies Concepcion To Uphold Class Action Waiver In Employee Arbitration Agreement
Next Post: Sayema Hameed Is Named A 2012 Southern California Rising Star by Super Lawyers »

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Categories

  • News
  • Press
  • Uncategorized

Archives

  • May 2022
  • February 2021
  • March 2020
  • October 2019
  • August 2019
  • June 2019
  • March 2019
  • December 2018
  • December 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • October 2016
  • July 2016
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • August 2014
  • June 2014
  • February 2014
  • October 2013
  • August 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • June 2011
  • April 2011
  • September 2010
  • February 2010
  • March 2009
  • May 2008

Connect

           

Tags

#MeToo Abercrombie anti-discrimination arbitration arbitration agreement baby bonding California california employment law CFRA coronavirus COVID-19 credit report DFEH disability discrimination DLSE EDD EEOC employee employer employment contract employment discrimination employment law entertainment family medical leave FEHA FMLA gender expression gender identity harassment healthcare hijab independent contractor meal break NLRB paid family leave pandemic pregnancy disability leave religion religious discrimination sex discrimination sexual harassment Sick Leave Law small business social media wrongful termination

Copyright © 2023 Cabada Hameed LLP· · Sitemap · <a href"/disclaimer/" Disclaimer Log in